Hi there , should the worst happen and your husband ends up with a permanent colostomy, there is a possibility that he could use the irrigation method to manage it. I use the method very successfully and only need to wear a bag the size a a large sticking plaster - i can swim etc with no sign of the bag. I irrigate every 2 days and it takes me about 40mins in total. If you want more info send me a message or ask your husbands stoma nurse. Good luck with everything

stef xx

Thanks for your reply.

I think he's contemplating saying no to surgical intervention, he slept badly last night. He says it's not fear it's the wish not to lose normal bowel function. His tumour was growing for up to two years and was huge at the start now it's not detectable. The consultant surgeon said the radiation could carry on working, however it's early days with this combination of treatment so there's no data yet and no comparisons I suppose because surgery has so far interrupted things for all those prescribed it. Nobody can say what will happen if he doesn't have the debris and a margin of healthy bowel removed, it could be that it's all dead and will never pose a threat. The scans all show no other hot spots, no sign of spread to anywhere. Maybe it's a benign malignancy, one with no strength to regrow even if what's left are a few cells that have been filtered into his lymph glands.

So far his cancer has not made him feel unwell, he did suffer the constipating effects of an increasing obstruction. The proposed surgery is complicated and will involve up to 8 hours of anaesthesia, of lying still. There are risks of leakage and infections, stuff he knows will make him unwell. What to do for the best, I dont know.

Plaese try to perusade him to have the op, I have said i would have it done if nessecary, noe the MDT have sain im not suitable for surgery im gutted at this outcome > I have heard that some people train their bowel so they dont need a bag all the time, please try to gert him to change his mind, I would if I had the choicexx

Hi I can only echo what has alreday been said - have the op , I would leave nothing to chance , basically its a bag and life or ? Your husbands proposed op sounds the same as mine - I was meant to be in hospital for 2 weeks but 'escaped' after just 5 nights. I won't pretend it was easy but I'm great now and back at work full time. As i said before the irrigation method might be a good option for your husband take care and get all the advice you can

stef xx

Hi..... Colostomy.........I have nursed many people with colostomys, in their own home and within the wards.  Everyone is horrified at first to have such a thing....but it never takes long before the person comes to terms with dealing with a bag attached to your body... because thats what it is...and the only difference is its on the outside .  They can be managed very efficiently these days, there are different types , they can be changed regularly or when needed.  No one would know when clothed as long as one has good hygiene habits.   Its not the end of the world.  More people than you would ever realise have one.... believe me..   Give it a chance.

Thanks all for your responses, I think he's going to have the op but he's very upset knowing that once he has signed the consent form and been put under he wont know if he will have a redundant rectum or not, it's terrifying him. Today though he's going to talk to a chap he's heard of that had a temporary iliostomy that's recently been reversed. It's what he hopes for himself.

Thanks all for your responses, I think he's going to have the op but he's very upset knowing that once he has signed the consent form and been put under he wont know if he will have a redundant rectum or not, it's terrifying him. Today though he's going to talk to a chap he's heard of that had a temporary iliostomy that's recently been reversed. It's what he hopes for himself.

My dad has a permanent colostomy bag. I am sure he didn't tell me the full truth about how he felt about it. But from what my mum told me he did find it hard to cope in the beginning, and that is only natural.

It would be better to agree to the op, and get the ball rolling sooner rather than later.

I think the bags are discreet, when looking at him you can't tell he is wearing one. (Unless he has flipped up his shirt to have a look at it).

I am pretty sure that my dad as offered counselling after the op, which he didn't take. But he always spoke up it openly with my mum (his wife). They have even laughed about it.

I hope your husband learns to cope, and I wish you the best too because I know cancer has an impact on all family members.

Thank you for your reassuring reply, it is useful to hear about people surviving well and keeping a sense of humour.

I don't know how close your husband is to the op now - I wish him well.

I was thinking about colostomies the other day (like you do); we can never guess that someone has a colostomy, can we?  When you consider the number of people who do have them... Any that I know of the person has actually told me for some reason.  But I would never have known otherwise.

I hope meeting people who have learned how to cope or have had stoma reversals has helped him. Take care,

Expat

I add my good wishes!!  The Rollercoaster Ride continues eh??  I know the moment Ian woke from his colon cancer operation his hand went for a feel to see if he had a bag - as I guess most people's would.  A friend in the motor trade who had Stage 2 colon cancer (with no spread) 11 years ago had a bag for a few months while all his "bits" healed.  He quite often called into our workshop during the summer with the briefest of shorts on.  I knew he had a bag but was completely flumoxed as to where it was    And Newbie's Jan is taking her bag on a trip to Africa soon - and I'm not talking luggage type bag!!  So a "bag" does not define your life.  Easy for me to say, though, with all my bits and pieces where they should be.

Keep us posted won't you.  Hold on tight to that Rollercoaster!!!

Lorraine

Hello and thanks for your letter. Tom our eldest wanted to know why his Dad needs to have this drastic surgery if the cancer looks nuked on the scan. Phil had an appointment with the surgeon on Monday so I asked him Tom's question first. Surprisingly he alerted us to a clinical trial that is being conducted from the Royal Marsden hospital London. It's called 'Watch and Wait' deferring surgery and scanning regularly and doing a sigmoidoscopy. It lasts for ten years and surgery is given if there is any evidence of cancer activity. The surgeon says it is not policy to suggest a patient for a trial but he would be happy to refer Phil if he wants to go on it. Its a few years in and there is a good percentage of participants who are remaining well! Today Phil is going to see if he is suitable for it. I really hope he is because we are all dreading this operation for the physical mental and financial hardship it's going to bring. (no matter how positive and upbeat we are) I do wonder why nobody who works for Cancer Research didn't comment on my original post and alert me to the trial?

Well that's a plan.... and we all need a Plan!!  And one that doesn't involve drastic surgery, pain, stress and as you say financial hardship sounds like a pretty good plan too, so long as you have all the information to make a well-informed decision.  Keep us posted!!!!  Lorraine

I was thinking about you and Phil last night, Sue, while I was waiting for my quadruple dose of sleep remedy to kick in

The quality of the monitoring is SO IMPORTANT.  About two (I think) years after Ian went into remission with clear CT scans, the oncologist said too many CTs were dangerous and we accepted that - they involve so many x-ray images, of course there was an element of risk.  So the oncologist said Ian would be monitored by x-ray.  I was always scared the cancer would come back in Ian's liver rather than his lungs.  I asked if chest x-rays would be good enough.  I got put in my place fairly firmly that chest x-rays would show the liver - duhhh! I'm not a doctor, I'm a typist, I didn't actually know where the liver was....  But I accepted the word of the oncologist that chest x-rays would do the job.

Six monthly x-rays continued and they showed absolutely no return of cancer.  It was only Ian reporting unexplained discomfort in his back and feeling a bit unwell (plus his tumor markers being just above the normal range) that alerted oncology to the possible return of the cancer.  The x-ray in July last year was completely and utterly clear - no lung tumors showing and no lymph node mass showing.  But an urgent CT showed dozens!!! of small lung tumors and the para-aortic lymph node "mass" swollen with cancer measuring 2.8cm x 2.6cm.  Oncology then ceased relying on x-rays because they were useless at picking up Ian's relapsed cancer.

So, Sue, make absolutely sure that the tools used to "watch" while "waiting" are the best - the absolute best.  How I wish we had just paid privately for an annual CT scan.  How differently things would be now for Ian if the relapse had been picked up six, twelve, eighteen months sooner???

I don't ever want you to walk to my shoes or Phil to walk in Ian's shoes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lorraine

Dear Lorraine, I'm grateful for your support and your experienced advice. When Phil came home from work he'd changed his mind again. He feels 'blocked up' again and straight away thinks its the tumour growing back to life. He spoke in the afternoon with the colorectal nurse who had sat in with the surgeon on Monday and asked her about being referred for the trial, he asked how long he would have to wait for surgery if he wasn't accepted on the trial, she said two to three weeks. The trial is at the Royal Marsden and is being run by Dr Diana Tait. They use scans and a sigmoidoscopy. Later last night Tom rang and I told him in Phil's hearing that his Dad had got cold feet about the trial but when I ended the call Phil said "That was earlier, I've thought some more." He said the constipation could be stress induced. I Googled Dr Tait and found a number for her personal secretary so Phil is going to ring her. I'm going to show him your letter too though. He feels he is not being given as much information as he needs and thinks that is down to the NHS being so stretched. I wouldn't want to walk in your shoes Lorraine or Ians and not Phils. Cancer sucks. x

Just out in the kitchen by the computer to make a last cuppa for the day.  Yes, Sue, those two little words sum it all up:

     Cancer Sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lorraine

Swedes,

Just a few thoughts from me as I have only just seen your original post. Fifteen months ago I had stage 2 cancer in the rectum and I was also warned that I may have a temporary colostomy or even a permanent one. They never quite know how the operation will go until they are in there and so I went under the knife having had a site selected (with a nice purple felt tip) for the bag. My attitude was that it was either bag or box and I would much rather have a bag than end up in a box.

I like riding horses and I posted on a horse riding forum about the coming operation and posibility of a colostomy. I was surprised to get several replies saying that they had a permanent bag and were still riding competitively to a high level. Indeed one person said that having had the operation and the permanent bag had made her snap out of her ways and decide to really start riding with gusto. I also spoke to a friend with a bag and he said that he had got used to it now and couldn't be bothered to have the reversal operation.

In the event I was all sewn back up without a bag at all even though during the operation the tumour was found to be lower down in the rectum than expected and also the surgeon decided to take out 50% of my colon as well because the wall looked a bit odd.

I am sorry but the decision is quite clear for me. Get the tumour cut out.