Hi,
My Dad recently had a stroke, was discharged from hospital after a few days with weakness is his left side, and then readmitted a week later when his condition deteriorated. Whilst investigating the cause for this he was found to have had multiple further strokes and 'fatty lumps' were also found on his kidney and liver. A liver biopsy was performed and we heard back from the Doctor today following the MDT. They have said the biopsy showed secondary liver cancer but due to the strokes they will not be investigating any further to try and identify the primary and are not offering any treatment. He is being sent home with palliative care and we have been told the end is not imminent but also that he doesn't have years. I can't get my head around the fact that they are not prepared to offer any treatment, I had assumed it would be Dad's decision whether he wanted to go down that path. Is this usual practice? Would it be wise to get a second opinion? I would be really grateful to hear from anyone with a similar experience.
How is it possible to give a prognosis without knowing the primary cancer? Although I appreciate 'not imminent but not years' is really vague and not much of a prognosis. I just want to know what to expect and whether we have got a few good months to make some memories or whether it's going to be downhill all the way now. Still in shock and don't even know how to begin processing this.
Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.