My mum has recently been diagnosed with stage 3 lung cancer. The consultants say that it's treatable and seem optimistic. The first consultant we had was really positive and thinks that my mum will respond well to treatment. My mum is 70 but looks a lot younger and is in fairly good health.
I spoke to a MacMillan nurse on the phone and she was really negative that long term survival with stage 3 lung cancer is really unlikely. She said that I should only trust MacMillan statistics (couldn't find any on lung cancer) and Cancer Research (which uses lung cancer statistics from 2002 and 2006!). The first consultant said that treatment has improved for lung cancer and ten years ago it would have been bad news for my mum.
I also read that people with even stage 4 cancer can live for two years or more (research supported by MacMillan) and the nurse said that they only have six months! I also read on MacMillan's site that people with treatable but not curable cancer can live for several years.
What the nurse said really worried me. I'm scared that my mum won't live that long or respond to treatment. I read more recent statistics for lung cancer on an American site and they said five year survival for regional (stage 3) lung cancer is 35 percent whilst the nurse said that it's only 6 percent and not to trust other statistics (the 6 percent was the statistic for stage 3 lung cancer in the 2002-2006 statistics on the cancer research website).
Just to note this was not the MacMillan nurse that my mum has been allocated but on the phone in Scotland.