Genetic testing

hey guys! 

I wondered if anyone could enlighten me on the genetics testing situation! 

It is all new to me ... also I’ve been waiting around 2/3 weeks to have the results back... mine may be taking a little longer as I transferred to a different hospital. Anyway... I didn’t realise how important it is to find out if your cancer is genetic / just bad luck. I’m waiting on my results as it depends on which surgery I have and also has a big affect on the longer future aspect of cancer. 

 

Jess x

  • Hi Jess, 

    Hopefully some of our members who have been down the gene testing path will pop by when they can to share their experiences with you but in the meantime I just thought I would make you aware of the information we have about this on our website.

    I hope this helps but feel free to give our cancer nurses a call if you have any further questions. You can contact them on 0808 800 4040, Monday - Friday between 9a.m - 5p.m.

    Fingers crossed those test results come back soon.

    All the best, 

    Steph, Cancer Chat Moderator

  • Hi Jessie,

    Welcome to the forum, although obviously I'd rather you hadn't had cause to join us!

    Sorry I'm not up to speed with your earlier posts so I will have missed some stuff.  I take it they have had reason to test you?  My understanding is that nowhere is currently routinely testing.

    When my mum first had breast cancer she wasn't tested, despite being very young.  She asked again to be tested when she got breast cancer in her 60s but was again told it wasn't necessary and that her daughters were at no increased risk.

    Roll on 8 years and I have breast cancer young, surprise surprise I pushed for testing and our family has a mutation on the BRCA2 gene.  You're right that it can alter your treatment so it is very useful, sometimes even very important, to know.  That said they don't routinely test for a genetic mutation so it isn't deemed useful enough to warrant testing everyone for mutations (that would be costly and very time-consuming obviously).

    Some chemotherapies are better for BRCA mutations than they are for the non-BRCA mutation cancers, but the genetic aspect also increases your risk of other cancers in the future and also recurrence so it does open up the possibility of prophylactic surgery, surgeries that you might otherwise be refused.

    My mum is now being tested but her blood hasn't even been taken yet so I have no idea how long her results will take to come back (she's Perth region).  My older sister's results took around 3 weeks to come back (she's Aberdeenshire).  I live in a different country (Jersey) but we can't test for the genetic mutations so my blood had to be sent to London, it took around 2 months for my results to come back.  Sorry that's unhelpful, but it shows at least that it will differ from region to region.

    Here if you want to talk further.

    LJx

  •  Ive heard back about the genetics . They’ve said I don’t have lynch syndrome (from the block they have tested) . I have to go to my nearest genetic centre and have further tests for other possible genetic syndromes that could potentially put me at a higher risk of cancer / or my cancer reoccurring. Are you able to  explain this to me a little better? What will this mean with my bowel surgery etc? Don’t worry if you can’t answer my questions , 

    j x

  • Hi Jessie,

    I did start studying genetics at university prior to getting ill and having to quit uni so my basic understanding of the subject isn't too bad (as an identical twin I still read a lot of genetics).  However, please note that I'm not qualified in any way on the subject and can really only speak from my own experience of genetic testing.

    Apologies if you know this already, but the cells in our body will usually have 2 copies of each gene.  One copy is inherited from our mother, the other from our father.  Our body has genes whose job it is to suppress tumours (the proteins of those genes repair DNA).  If one of those genes is mutated (basically has errors on it) then it won't do its job properly and tumours aren't suppressed. If one of your parents has a mutated gene then you have a 50-50 chance of it being passed on to you (remember they also have two copies of each gene so they may pass on to you the healthy copy or the mutated copy).

    So for me all they had to do was take a blood sample, they then tested it for mutations on the BRCA1, BRCA2, PAL-B and CHEK2 genes. With different cancers it's different genes, so there will be a list of genes that fall under the banner of 'Lynch Syndrome' that they will look at, and a mutation in one or more of those genes would indicate Lynch syndrome.  I realise with some cancers they do testing on the tumour and that can suggest if a condition is likely, but there will be other genes not included in that syndrome that can increase your risk of certain cancers.

    So they've ruled out Lynch Syndrome for you which is great.  My recollection is that Lynch Syndrome is relatively common so with your type of cancer (colorectal?) it makes sense they would test the genes that fall under that banned first.  And it looks like now they are going to test to see if you have mutated copies of other genes that don't fall under that banner.

    I'm not sure where you are at with your bowel surgery (sorry I've probably missed other posts) but as a general rule having a mutated gene can mean you are eligible for prophylactic surgery.  This is where body tissue (in my case it would be the unaffected breast and my ovaries) can be removed as these are the most likely places for cancer to develop, it's a preventative measure.  So if they find you have a mutated copy of a gene and that increases your risk of breast cancer they may say you can opt for a double mastectomy, for example.  Obviously some organs can't just be removed cause we need them.

    If you have bowel surgery planned I cannot see how the genetic testing would affect that but I don't know much about that area.  However, it could alter other treatments as some chemical treatments have a better effect on genetically-driven cancers.

    My example is that I my breast cancer was initially treated with FEC-T chemotherapy.  This is very much the standard for breast cancer.  However, the type of chemotherapy I'm about to start (Platinum) is a very common general chemotherapy, but it is known to be more effective on breast cancers where there is BRCA2 mutation involvement than on non-genetic breast cancers.

    Sorry I'm rambling as always.  Not long woken up and obviously I don't know what level your knowledge of this area is at, and when we start talking genetics it's a complex area.

    Hope that helps somewhat though.  Feel free to message me if I can explain anything further, just remember I am not medically qualified, but I promise I will make it clear if I am presuming something or just making an educated guess.  That said you don't know me from Adam so the usual warnings of being careful where you get your information from apply.

    LJx