I am in the position of being a doctor undergoing treatment for invasive breast cancer. I was diagnosed in November and have almost completed neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, opting for 4 cycles each of FEC and Docetaxel. I have coped with this, despite multiple admissions with infection better than anyone gives me credit for. Of course as a doctor I have come to treatment with expectations, time lines and agenda as a doctor and I cannot switch to patient mode. This has caused tension with the colleagues who treat me.
My current dilemma relates to surgery which is scheduled in about 7 weeks time, but not yet fixed, and what I perceive as the best treatment for me as the individual. I have always been upfront and said the best treatment for me is a mastectomy and Lymph node clearance on the affected side and a risk reducing mastectomy on the other side, I have intermediate/high risk genetically. I am certain to need radiotherapy and have opted for a later reconstruction.
Here is where I differ in my options with the team, I want both breasts gone now, move forward with radiotherapy and then recover for reconstruction. The team think I am rushing and losing focus and think I should just focus on the affected side. I cannot express how many hours have gone into thinking of this since the day I got my biopsy results.
I have seen the clinical psychologist who agrees I am logical and pragmatic and fully aware of the risks of surgery and the benefits to me. I truly think the associated risks of surgery post chemo have been inflated having researched this very thoroughly.
I respect my surgeon and her reputation, I can’t comprehend the decision and need to work on a compromise. Of course this was a long consultation in a Friday which leaves you mulling with no solutions