Hi all,
I have had an enlarged lymph node (classic pea sized) for about 3-4 months. Had it looked over, GP said he didn't see anything that worried him but sent me to get a blood test. Bloods came back fine (had to ring them after a week to get results).
The lympnode did not go after another month so I was booked in for a UT scan, in that time I had another lump develop just above the lymph node which the GP pescribed me with antibiotics over suspected ingrown hair which did go down and is now just a very slight bump.
Had the UT scan and rung my gp today after 3 days of waiting and the reception said the results came back satisfactory and the lump was an enlarged lymph node (which I was aware of anyway) but the worry was that cancer was causing the enlarged lymph node.
I guess what im left a little confused at is, what does satisfcatory mean? Are there 'Good' results? And, I assume if there was any cancerous lumops beneath my skin they would have came up on the scan (he did scan my whole neck and take a whole bunch of photo's. The last thing is that I've now had an enlarged lymph node for 4 months and theres been no evidence as to what the reason could be.
