Hi Sanner

My situation is similar to yours in that they were unable to gain entry to my uterus because of a badly scarred cervix and so no biopsies were taken.  After the second hysteroscopy which was done under general anaesthetic,  I was referred for an urgent mri and told I may need a hysterectomy.  I am currently waiting for the results of the scan.  I am worried about having a hysterectomy without the information that only a biopsy can provide.

I understand your frustration with the vague letters - I've had telephone conversations that are just as uninformative.  After my first hysteroscopy I was told by phone that everything was ok, only to receive a letter saying the results of the biopsy were inconclusive and I would need a second hysteroscopy.   It turned out later that my uterus had been perforated and I've no idea where they took the biopsy from.  They only realised what had happened when during the second hysteroscopy a more experienced doctor recognised that a false passage had been created and they weren't  inside my uterus at all.   Nobody has explained anything to me and when I rang the consultant about the hysterectomy without a biopsy, she just seemed irritated and offhand.

I assume it's  because they're so busy and after reading other posts I realise we're all in the same boat, left waiting and worrying.  I can understand why you're scared after what you've already been through and I really hope you get some answers at your appointment and that it turns out ok.  

I'd love to hear how you get on.  Good luck.

Cobweb