Diagnosis was it quick or slow ?

I was diagnosed last October with ovarian cancer , I went to the dr because I had several bouts of horrendous diahreoa and my stomach was very bloated after an examination I was told I had blood in my urine and that I diverticulitis and was given antibiotics I finished the course and went back as I was peeing a lot and bloated I was given more antibiotics again I went back same symptoms apart from the diahreoa by this point I could feel the lump in my stomach and I had to buy a size bigger trousers again I had an examination and was told to come back the following week if I was still the same . I managed to get an appointment a few days later with my own doctor and right away she knew something was far wrong with me and put me straight to hospital After seeing 4 doctors over 5 weeks . I had a lengthy operation as the cancer had a mucus which had stuck to everything  no after treatment as the cancer can only be operated on . I get my first scan in April so fingers crossed

  • Waiting is rubbish isn't it.  Hope it goes well.

     

  • Hi Repsol, Im not a medical personnel... so this is based only on my experience and research. If you are talking about the technical aspect of diagnostic process, then the waiting time depends on the procedure employed. For example, Doctors could promptly give readings on Scan results as soon as they have the scan to read. Meanwhile some laboratory procedures (like those that involves growing cellular cultures) could take weeks or months to have a results. If you are talking about the administrative aspect of diagnosis, then that depends from country to country, even hospitals to hospitals. Im not from UK so couldnt answer how UK medical service works. In my country there is a significant difference between a public run hospital and a private run hospital. Public hospitals, usually, dont readily recommend expensive diagnostic procedures like X-ray or CT-Scan, unless truly necessary or in a case of emergency. So public doctors usually try to make initial diagnosis based only on patient interviews, suggest treatments based on that, and will rather wait for further development. Of course, if the disease is much more serious then it could take a significant amount of time to have a proper diagnosis which would in turn delay the administration of a proper treatment. Private hospitals however, will also try to make initial diagnosis and treatments based on patient interviews (to arrest any immediate suspicion of infections, for example) but they will also recommend more complicated diagnostic procedures (such as scans, lab tests etc) running in parallel to the initial treatment to capture all possible causes of the ailments. Of course some could argue that private hospitals do that just to make a lot more money by recommending "unnecessary" and expensive diagnostic procedures.