Hi everyone,
Long time lurker here but now desperately in need of some advice/support from you lovely lot.
Quick intro - diagnosed IDC grade 3 15/02 after 2 core biopsies, 16mm lump, er+ve, pr-ve, her2 unknown.
Lumpectomy SLNB and 4 lymph nodes removed 25/02.
Surgery results 10/03 - clear margins and nodes, 20mm tumour, er+ve, pr-ve, her2-ve, all very positive, surgeon happy as larry and assured me with such good outcome could not imagine chemo being necessary. Happy dances all round
Fast forward to appt with onco yesterday where I was told 6 cycles of AT recommended followed by 6 weeks of rads and hormone therapy after Gutted is an absolute understatement. He says that due to my ER being low positive my cancer is exactly the same as TNBC and has to be treated the same.
Just feel totally blind sided, why wasn't TNBC mentioned before if low HR positivity is classed exactly the same?
After having researched till my eyes bled about HR+ve and treatment options, and come to an informed decision about not doing chemo, I am now in the horrid position of having to make a decision based on a totally new situation. I have 1 week to make up my mind .....
Sorry for babbling and thanks for reading, am just wondering if anyone else has been in the same situation regarding ER low positive and what decisions you have taken regarding treatment?
Thanks,
Kaz xx.
