I am still angry after 18 months about the way I was treated at hospital during investigation of possible DCIS. Of course I am grateful that the routine screening picked me up so early. Having lost my mother to breast cancer when she was only 46, and I was 19, I am highly sensitised to all suggestions of possible causes for concern. (I have taken part in research programmes in the past to try and help understand genetic links.)
The clinic failed to take account of my elevated anxiety having been told of abnormalities on my mammogram. The biopsy procedure felt brutal to me - undressing in a large room with staff present and no screen or any attempt to protect dignity . It was extremely painful and traumatic. I felt no real attempt was made to understand how traumatic the process was for me given my history, particularly being recently widowed, and alone, after my husband's death from a brain tumour 2 years before.
When the biopsy results were known, there was a delay before I could be seen at the Breast clinic to be given the results.
so the results were known by the NHS but not by me. I spent 45 minutes on the phone talking to a receptionist explaining why I could not psychologically manage the wait for the results. I asked that I be given the results. This was declined on the grounds that I needed the support of the team when I was told the results.
My argument was that these results were mine. Not the NHS's. My body belongs to me ... not to the Health Service.
Inevitably the NHS decided it was best for me to endure a week of hell waiting until they could fit me in. Inevitably the results were bad news. The support? A glass of water if required before I drove myself home.
I believe that I should be party to knowledge and information about my body as soon as it is available to health professionals. I was subjected to days and days of unbearable anxiety until the NHS saw fit to make me party to the results.
I did not choose to receive treatment from these "caring" professionals. I know systems exist for a reason. .... largely to make management of the individual "fit" the requirements of the system.
how do others feel?
