Hi
My husband was diagnosed with terminal cancer in his stomach last July and unfortunately it has spread into his spine,hips, ribs & shoulder. he has had 8 sessions of chemo and the CT scans taken during the treatment and recently has shown that the chemo has stopped any further spread or increase in cancer in the sites.
His oncologist has stopped chemo stating that his body needs a rest other, than fatigue he has had no side effects from the chemo. Plan is to have another CT scan in two months and take from there. My husband has now ended up in hospital twice since chemo stopped with an infection (not COVID) and the doctors there cannot understand why chemo has been stopped if its keeping the cancer at bay. That was my concern too why stop something if its working. We know what the end result is but its about buying time just now as we have a 10 year old son.
I am not aure that our oncologist is being truthful with us. We have a friend battling cancer (now terminal) but has had 100 sessions of chemo over a number of years to prolong her life.
Is it finance driven that if terminal they would only give us a set amount of chemo regardless of the fact its halting the spread?
anyone else experienced this x