When "catching it early" means nothing

I lost my beautiful amazing mum one month ago to Metastatic Breast Cancer which had spread to the Ovaries,Liver,Bones and Peritneoum. She had an early stage Breast Cancer in 2007 for which she had a lumpectomy and radiotherapy followed by 5 years of Tamoxifen. Up until Jan this year she was walking 15 miles a day and teaching multiple group fitness classes then the 2nd week of Jan she had a few aches and pains in her back for which she went to the doctors and was prescribed painkillers then a week later she was struggling to get out of bed and being sick. Doctors did blood tests and mum received a call to go A&E as she had high calcium levels in her blood. 3 days later and after multiple scans and tests she was told it had come back and was widespread. She had been for regular mammograms and took amazing care of herself, she had no lumps or bumps in her breast in fact the Oncologist said that what is likely to have happened is a few tiny cells from the Original Cancer escaped and laid dormant going undetected for years and then they woke up and started going everywhere. There was no opportunity to catch this Cancer early and it makes me really upset and angry when all the advertising campaigns are geared towards checking yourself and catching it early when this wasn't possible in my mums case (and plenty of others I am sure). Mum had no symptoms until it was very late and she gained her angel wings only 3 weeks after diagnosis at 56. I have read that only 5% of money donated to the big cancer charities actually goes towards research into Metastatic diesese and how it happens and still no one really knows how/what and why it happens and yet this is the only way that the big C actually kills. Another shocking figure is that 30% of early stage Breast Cancer comes back similar to the way it did for mum. My question is what is being done to prevent this and are we any closer to actually finding out why and how we can stop this from happening? Thanks in advance x

  • Just read your post, fluid was found in my lung after aspiration cancer cells found as yet don't know where they originate from. I've had breast cancer 2003 and 2012. I agree with a lot of the post of only being checked for breast reoccurrence and not getting any information of what else to look out for. I had a tickly cough and wanted advice to stop smoking, non urgent chest X Ray picked the fluid up. It's been 2 months now without answers. After  the fluid was checked you were told it was from ovaries? I'm at my wits end, been to oncology today and they want to start on chemo to cover lung, breast and ovaries even though all tests show no masses. 

  • thanks for the response, Nurse Sarah

     

    jule - is this a pleural effusion?

  • Yes Jack, malignant plural effusion at present. Fluid removed awaiting what next to do. 

  • ah okay my Mum had that x

    they eventually fitted her with a drain

  • Alera90 I am so very sorry for your loss.

     

    My mum has recently found out her original breast cancer had come back in the same breast from 23yrs ago. They have called it stage 4 metastatic breast cancer, similar to your mums diagnosis it laid dormant in her body until one day it erupted and spread. Apparently she is see if she is able to trial a hormonal tablet (she might not get it yet) Due to covid she has already waited a month for the appointment and every since I researched found out that yeah it's true. The funding isn't there for secondary breast cancer patients which too shocked me.

    I had took part in the race for life ever since my mums first diagnosis and continued too after losing lots of loved one to this disease upto before covid hit. Raised lots of money other ways to help donate to the research and wonder why it's such a small percent for secondary patients.