When "catching it early" means nothing

I lost my beautiful amazing mum one month ago to Metastatic Breast Cancer which had spread to the Ovaries,Liver,Bones and Peritneoum. She had an early stage Breast Cancer in 2007 for which she had a lumpectomy and radiotherapy followed by 5 years of Tamoxifen. Up until Jan this year she was walking 15 miles a day and teaching multiple group fitness classes then the 2nd week of Jan she had a few aches and pains in her back for which she went to the doctors and was prescribed painkillers then a week later she was struggling to get out of bed and being sick. Doctors did blood tests and mum received a call to go A&E as she had high calcium levels in her blood. 3 days later and after multiple scans and tests she was told it had come back and was widespread. She had been for regular mammograms and took amazing care of herself, she had no lumps or bumps in her breast in fact the Oncologist said that what is likely to have happened is a few tiny cells from the Original Cancer escaped and laid dormant going undetected for years and then they woke up and started going everywhere. There was no opportunity to catch this Cancer early and it makes me really upset and angry when all the advertising campaigns are geared towards checking yourself and catching it early when this wasn't possible in my mums case (and plenty of others I am sure). Mum had no symptoms until it was very late and she gained her angel wings only 3 weeks after diagnosis at 56. I have read that only 5% of money donated to the big cancer charities actually goes towards research into Metastatic diesese and how it happens and still no one really knows how/what and why it happens and yet this is the only way that the big C actually kills. Another shocking figure is that 30% of early stage Breast Cancer comes back similar to the way it did for mum. My question is what is being done to prevent this and are we any closer to actually finding out why and how we can stop this from happening? Thanks in advance x

Parents
  • Hello Alera and thanks for posting,

    I am so sorry to learn about your mum.  After 10 years of her doing okay it must have been especially hard for you all when the cancer came back and was so widespread.

    The advertising campaigns are pitched at people who may not realise they have symptoms that could be due to cancer. Some people delay seeing their GP for ages because they don’t know anything serious might be the matter. The campaigns reflect the fact that in many types of cancer, initial treatment is usually more likely to succeed when a cancer is at an early stage. The earlier a cancer is found the less likely it is to have already spread through the body before being treated. But some cancers don’t have any obvious stand out symptoms when they are still small, so sadly when they are first picked up by then they are advanced. The campaign messages tend to be directed at the majority, but I can appreciate that they can sometimes miss the mark and be upsetting.

    Unfortunately an early stage doesn’t guarantee that a cancer hasn’t spread and will never come back, but even so, because of the much lower risk of a recurrence with early stage disease, it is an idea worth perusing even though some people might not benefit. I am not sure where you got your 30% statistic from. It doesn’t sound quite right to me for these days because statistics look backwards and breast cancer treatments have advanced, but whatever the figure, it is true that after treatment some people will have a recurrence so more research is needed to prevent this.    

    Researching new ways of diagnosing cancer as earlier as possible is one way of trying to prevent cancer from spreading. Another way is trying to find out more about the process of cancer spreading to be able to hinder it. Research is looking at more effective initial treatments so that any stray cells that do escape before surgery or radiotherapy don’t survive. And of course research is still trying to find more successful treatments when cancer has spread. I can’t tell you how long it will be before the entire process of cancer spreading is fully understood, or when there will be more effective treatments for people whose cancer has spread, but research is getting closer.  

    We fund all sorts of research, a lot of which looks into the biology of cancers to try and understand how they behave including how they invade and spread. You can read about some examples of our research into breast cancer at this link   and about some facts and figures about our research funding here.

    If you want to know more about the research we fund you can get in touch by email so your request can be passed on to our research information team. To do this you would need to follow this link to contact our Supporter Services team.

    I hope this is of some use.

    Take care,

    Julia 

Reply
  • Hello Alera and thanks for posting,

    I am so sorry to learn about your mum.  After 10 years of her doing okay it must have been especially hard for you all when the cancer came back and was so widespread.

    The advertising campaigns are pitched at people who may not realise they have symptoms that could be due to cancer. Some people delay seeing their GP for ages because they don’t know anything serious might be the matter. The campaigns reflect the fact that in many types of cancer, initial treatment is usually more likely to succeed when a cancer is at an early stage. The earlier a cancer is found the less likely it is to have already spread through the body before being treated. But some cancers don’t have any obvious stand out symptoms when they are still small, so sadly when they are first picked up by then they are advanced. The campaign messages tend to be directed at the majority, but I can appreciate that they can sometimes miss the mark and be upsetting.

    Unfortunately an early stage doesn’t guarantee that a cancer hasn’t spread and will never come back, but even so, because of the much lower risk of a recurrence with early stage disease, it is an idea worth perusing even though some people might not benefit. I am not sure where you got your 30% statistic from. It doesn’t sound quite right to me for these days because statistics look backwards and breast cancer treatments have advanced, but whatever the figure, it is true that after treatment some people will have a recurrence so more research is needed to prevent this.    

    Researching new ways of diagnosing cancer as earlier as possible is one way of trying to prevent cancer from spreading. Another way is trying to find out more about the process of cancer spreading to be able to hinder it. Research is looking at more effective initial treatments so that any stray cells that do escape before surgery or radiotherapy don’t survive. And of course research is still trying to find more successful treatments when cancer has spread. I can’t tell you how long it will be before the entire process of cancer spreading is fully understood, or when there will be more effective treatments for people whose cancer has spread, but research is getting closer.  

    We fund all sorts of research, a lot of which looks into the biology of cancers to try and understand how they behave including how they invade and spread. You can read about some examples of our research into breast cancer at this link   and about some facts and figures about our research funding here.

    If you want to know more about the research we fund you can get in touch by email so your request can be passed on to our research information team. To do this you would need to follow this link to contact our Supporter Services team.

    I hope this is of some use.

    Take care,

    Julia 

Children
No Data