I've been diagnosed with a small tumour on my liver and at outpatients I was advised it will be removed via either ablation or surgery. Then, following clinical meeting, I have been advised that further tests are required, including a biopsy via endoscopy. I understood that biopsy was a) risky due to risk of bleeding and b) not required as contrast dye on both CT and MRI scans identify it clearly. Why now would they decide on this route?
I'm waiting for my nurse to get back to me
