My sister has a sarcoma of the tonsils that has spread to her spine. Her diagnosis is terminal. She will soon start her 6th and final round of acute chemotherapy. The treatment seems to be holding her cancer in check and she's tolerating it very well. However, she can't get a straight answer from her oncologist as to why the treatment will stop after 6 rounds. From what I've read, I suspect it's due to cost of and ever increasing demand for such NHS treatment. I may be able to pay for the treatment to be continued - if we could get a straight answer to the question 'if resources were unlimited, does it make sense to continue with this treatment?' Anyone out there qualified to answer this?