Hello,
Please I am very confused with my two diagnosis. I was recalled from an initial mammogram, where the consultant radiographer performed a punch biopsy. Afterwards she told me that the "6mm partially defined density" of "ill defined mass is probably malignant" with "appearances suspicious to a small cancer". I was therefore referred to an "MDT meeting" the following week where a consultant oncoplastic breast surgeon then "confirmed intermediate changes to the breast but no cancerous cells". The breast surgeon however now wants to "remove more tissue to check under the microscope just in case."
I don't understand how the diagnosis went from "cancerous" to "intermediate changes to the breast"? I don't really know who to believe? The consultant radiographer was very certain it was cancer but the consultant breast surgeon now tells me it's not.
Please can someone clarify? Whom do I believe?
Thanks very much.
